|
DPMF Publications: |
|
The Public Policy Process in Africa
|
1. The Public Policy Process in Africa
Leading, the discussions under this premier session, the presenter, (Dr.
Paul Anangwe of the University of Nairobi), noted that the public policy process
in Africa can be analyzed at three levels: policy making, policy implementation
and policy evaluation. At each level, there are a number of problems.
Using David Easton's model of the political system, a public
policy process can be divided into several parts, namely, the 'environment' in
which it is set, 'inputs' in terms of public demands and resources, a
'conversion process' comprising the decision-making system as well as the
organizational network, 'policy outputs' and a 'feedback mechanism'. Thus, the policy-making process entails multiple roles and it
is also a multi-actor process. Although
a policy choice may be selected by a single actor, the making of a policy is an
extended process that goes beyond the decision making system.
Key issues of concern in respect of African policy making include the
following:
Firstly, African policy makers do not seem to understand their policy
environments and the kinds of problems they generate.
This is attributed to the social distance between the policy makers and
the rest of the population. The
former belong to the elite group and their backgrounds make them perceive policy
problems from a perspective that is somewhat impaired, resulting in wrong
policies being made vis-a-vis policy problems that confront the bulk of the
population.
Secondly, African policy makers seem to be making choices without
adequate information because of poor articulation between political and
administrative roles in the policy process.
Often politicians would like to seize the initiative in making certain
policies, and they tend to do so without adequate knowledge of the consequences,
a problem that could have been avoided if they had listened to the expertise
which the bureaucrats possess.
In addition, research institutions have been marginalized to an extent
that their findings do not meaningfully impact on the policy process.
Thirdly, the inability to mobilize adequate resources as well as the
inability to effectively utilize available capacity render policy making a
symbolic exercise.
Policy implementation in Africa is also confronted with diverse problems.
For instance, implementation rates of national
development plans in the last two decades have ranged from between 5% and
30%. Another obvious constraint is the politicization of policy implementation.
Many interest groups are also not always aware of the content of policy
until the implementation begins. It
is only at this stage that powerful actors realize what a policy contains and
they then make vigorous attempts to frustrate the implementation of unpalatable
aspects of such a policy.
Policy evaluation is another problem area because the feedback mechanism
in African policy-making process is deliberately weakened.
African policy makers do not like to hear that their policies are
performing poorly. Hence, previous
mistakes remain undetected and uncorrected.
At the same time, no meaningful lessons can be learnt from past
performance within this milieu.
Notwithstanding these problems, it is fair to acknowledge that some
successes have been registered in Africa in some specific areas, the most
prominent being in education and health sectors.